New Yorker on Krugman

Very interesting profile via Tyler Cowen, who, I think, dances around the most interesting issues in the article and comments on Krugman’s travel habits and his Sci-Fi love instead. Maybe he’s worried about engaging with the prickly stuff. He teases us, however, with this:

and there is an interesting discussion of how his wife edits his work

Interesting? I’ll say (quotes below are from the New Yorker piece):

these days she focusses on making him less dry, less abstract, angrier.

Separating Issues

I think the island airport is awesome. Porter Airlines runs all the slots right now, which means, yes, they have a monopoly. Air Canada is looking to wipe that out:

Montreal-based Air Canada launched legal proceedings Wednesday, accusing Porter of having an “improper anti-competitive advantage” at Toronto’s downtown island airport.

I’m sure there are lots of weird details that the public don’t know anything about (why the monopoly in the first place? Why didn’t Air Canada look to develop this airport years earlier? etc), but one thing that irritates me is that people seem to confuse Porter Airlines with the Island Airport. Very different things.

Yes, Porter serves beer on its short haul flights and yes, the lines are shorter at the island airport. But I’d say that most of the sustainably great things about the Porter experience fall under the heading of “Great Things about the Island Airport” and those that are left are possibly unsustainable loss leading marketing gimmicks designed to secure share.

If it’s the airport that gives Porter its edge, then Air Canada should be able to deliver just as great an experience. Right?

Inflation

This is from the NYT today on the fed’s move to increase the rate paid on reserves:

“If you perfectly telegraph when you’re going to do it, you might as well do it that day, since so much of interest rate and monetary policy is about expectations,” she said. “It doesn’t matter so much what it is, versus what was expected.”

Maybe I’m reading too much Scott Sumner but I am often concerned that it is a point that people completely miss. Even in the context of the article quoted above, the message is about expectations of the interest rate on reserves or the target rate for the discount window, not inflation, which is the expectation that really matters.

I know that insurance companies don’t give a rat’s ass about what the interest rate is. They pay claims, which are governed by prices, which are sensitive to inflation. It is inflation expectations that will drive insurance rates up, which, of course, fuels ever greater inflation. Are the inflation hawks right? God, who knows, but it isn’t as simple as inflation good, all else, bad.

Careful, now.